White-Collar & Economic Offences
Complaints of cheating, criminal breach of trust and forgery that arise out of business relationships, before the High Court of Karnataka, for companies, directors, founders and professionals, and for investors and businesses that have themselves been defrauded.
When a business dispute becomes a criminal case
In India, commercial disagreements are frequently turned into criminal complaints. A supplier who has not been paid, a co-founder who has fallen out, an investor whose investment has failed or a former employee may file a complaint of cheating or criminal breach of trust, sometimes in another state, to gain leverage in what is essentially a civil or commercial dispute. The Supreme Court has repeatedly disapproved of this practice, most notably in Indian Oil Corporation v. NEPC India Ltd., (2006) 6 SCC 736 and Paramjeet Batra v. State of Uttarakhand, (2013) 11 SCC 673.
At the same time, genuine frauds do occur: embezzlement by employees, diversion of funds by partners or directors, forged documents and investment schemes that were dishonest from the start. The practice accepts a limited number of matters on both sides, with the focus on remedies before the High Court of Karnataka: quashing petitions, anticipatory bail and related writ proceedings. The governing law is the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) and the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which replaced the IPC, CrPC and Evidence Act on 1 July 2024.
Business Disputes Given a Criminal Colour
Complaints of criminal breach of trust (Section 316 BNS, formerly Section 406 IPC), cheating (Section 318 BNS, formerly Section 420 IPC) and forgery (Section 336 BNS, formerly Section 465 IPC) arising from unpaid invoices, failed investments, partnership and shareholder disputes, and terminated contracts. Where the allegations, even if accepted, do not disclose an offence, the High Court of Karnataka can quash the proceedings under Section 528 of the BNSS (formerly Section 482 CrPC). A mere failure to keep a promise or to pay is not cheating unless a dishonest intention existed when the promise was made (Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar, (2000) 4 SCC 168).
Quashing petitions in the High Court
Cheating and breach of trust complaints
Forgery and false-document allegations
Quashing on settlement of the dispute
Anticipatory Bail & Protection from Arrest
Anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS (formerly Section 438 CrPC), which may be sought from the Sessions Court or directly from the High Court of Karnataka, and bail before the High Court where an arrest has already been made. For offences punishable with up to seven years, the police are expected to issue a notice of appearance under Section 35(3) of the BNSS rather than arrest (Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273), and for offences punishable with three years or more but less than seven, a preliminary enquiry may be held under Section 173(3) before an FIR is registered. Where the FIR has been registered in another state, the Supreme Court has recognised that a court where the accused resides may, in urgent cases, grant limited interim protection so that the jurisdictional court can be approached (Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka, 2023).
Anticipatory bail in the High Court
Notices of appearance from the police
FIRs registered in other states
Clients who live abroad
Directors, Officers & Company Liability
Complaints against a company frequently name every director, including independent and nominee directors and those based abroad. Under the general criminal law there is no vicarious liability merely because a person holds office; the complaint must attribute a specific role to each person, unless a particular statute expressly makes officers liable (Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2015) 4 SCC 609). Where a statute does impose liability, such as Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoured cheques, it extends only to persons in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the company's business.
Independent and nominee directors
Directors and founders based abroad
Summons to company officers
Look Out Circulars arising from complaints
Complaints for Companies & Investors Who Have Been Defrauded
Where a genuine fraud has been committed, such as embezzlement by an employee, diversion of company funds, forged documents or an investment that was dishonest from the outset, a well-documented complaint is prepared for the police. If the police do not register it, an application is made to the Magistrate under Section 175(3) of the BNSS (formerly Section 156(3) CrPC), supported by an affidavit as the Supreme Court requires (Priyanka Srivastava v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2015) 6 SCC 287). The criminal complaint is planned alongside civil or commercial recovery, so that one does not undermine the other.
Employee and insider fraud
Diversion of funds by partners or directors
Documented complaints to the police
Coordination with civil recovery
Applicable Laws: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, Information Technology Act 2000, Companies Act 2013.
White-Collar Matters: Frequently Asked
A business partner has filed a cheating complaint over what is really a commercial dispute. Can the FIR be quashed?
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (formerly Section 482 CrPC) where the allegations, even if accepted as they stand, do not make out an offence, or where a purely civil dispute has been given a criminal colour. The Supreme Court has held that a mere breach of contract is not cheating unless a dishonest intention existed at the very beginning of the transaction (Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar, (2000) 4 SCC 168), and has disapproved of criminal proceedings used to pressure a party in a civil dispute (Paramjeet Batra v. State of Uttarakhand, (2013) 11 SCC 673). Each case depends on what the complaint actually alleges.
Can a director be prosecuted only because they are a director of the company?
Ordinarily not. Under the general criminal law there is no vicarious liability merely because a person is a director or officer; the complaint must attribute a specific role to that person, unless a particular statute expressly makes officers liable (Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2015) 4 SCC 609). Statutes such as Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act do create such liability, but only for persons in charge of and responsible for the company's business.
The FIR has been registered in another state. What protection is available in Bangalore?
Anticipatory bail is ordinarily sought from the court having jurisdiction over the place where the FIR is registered. In exceptional and urgent circumstances, the Supreme Court has held that a Sessions Court or High Court where the accused resides may grant limited interim protection for a short period, so that the accused can approach the court with jurisdiction (Priya Indoria v. State of Karnataka, 2023).
Will the police arrest immediately on a cheating complaint?
For offences punishable with imprisonment of up to seven years, the police are expected to issue a notice of appearance under Section 35(3) of the BNSS (formerly Section 41A CrPC) rather than arrest, unless the conditions for arrest are recorded in writing, following Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273. Cheating that induces delivery of property under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita carries up to seven years. Where arrest is a real risk, anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS should be considered early.
Request an Appointment
Send a WhatsApp message or email with a short description of the complaint and, if available, the FIR or notice received. Consultations are by appointment, in person or by video. An enquiry does not create a lawyer-client relationship.
Informational only, per Rule 36 of the Bar Council of India Rules. No solicitation of work is intended.